|
"Free sex is promoted in order to destroy the heterosexual family. The bankers who financed Communism want the state to replace the father as head of the family.
If they have their way, the family of the future will have no husband or father. This is straight out of Aldous Huxley's Brave New World where babies are born in test tubes.
Sexual intercourse represents the essence of her commitment to her husband and her offspring. Women who have had many partners find it more difficult to bond to one man, and consequently he has difficulty bonding with her.
Sexual liberation sanctions and encourages this callous and primitive behavior and invites the woman to collude in her own exploitation and degradation.
Men who do not become husbands and fathers and continue to see women as sex objects suffer from arrested development."
A spate of new books exhorts women to overcome their inhibitions about having casual sex.
Typical is "Happy Hook-Up: A Single Girl's Guide to Casual Sex" which counsels women to proudly embrace the labels "whore" and "slut." It has been excerpted on ivillage.com.
http://love.ivillage.com/snd/singleloveit/0,,79n1sr00,00.html
Feminist authors Alexa Sherman and Nicole Tocantins pretend to be offering women "options" (as with careers.) Typically, their real agenda is coercive and subversive, to override nature.
"Cultural norms will catch up with us if we give them no choice," they write.
"We, as females, need to show the world that sex without commitment is absolutely our prerogative... Say, "I'm a slut I'm a whore! I love sex!" and mean it. Society needs to change and begin to encourage women to find pleasure for pleasure's sake."
Pleasurable sex in the context of a loving marriage isn't mentioned as an "option."
This perverse propaganda is yet another assault on marriage and family, the institutions that sustain us both as individuals and as a society.
For centuries, London-based Masonic bankers have used "sexual liberation" -- sex unfettered by bonds of marriage and love -- to undermine society in advance of their totalitarian New World Order.
Women are naturally monogamous. Surveys indicate they do not find casual sex satisfying and mostly regret it.
http://news.scotsman.com/uk.cfm?id=536422005
Thus "Happy Hook-up" is devoted to helping women overcome their natural instinct to become attached.
Women are instructed not to get to know their sex partner too well. "Try not to discuss too much about your past or future or his. That said, it never hurts to inquire about his sexual history [and] gauge what risks are involved. Then, focus on the action and the action alone."
They are told to terminate the relationship after one or two trysts and distract themselves with work or hobbies.
Don't think about "what's going to happen next, whether he's going to call you, want you and be your everything. It's just not going to happen honey. At least don't expect it to. Stay in control...accept that that's it. Finito. The end. Flip him over. He's done."
PERVERSE MEANS 'UNHEALTHY'
It is perverse to divorce sex from propagation, and fixate on it for pleasure.
I'm NOT saying sex should be confined to propagation. I AM saying it is designed to take place in the psychological and social context of propagation, i.e. marriage or a long-term loving relationship.
Nature has put an alluring bloom on young women for an obvious reason, and it fades in time with their fertility.
Males are attracted to the bloom. In their bee-brains, pleasure is separate from procreation. They deposit their semen and move on to the next flower without concern for the woman or the consequences.
Sexual liberation sanctions and encourages this callous and primitive behavior and invites the woman to collude in her own exploitation and degradation.
It allows the male to take the only thing that interests him and ignore the woman's humanity in terms of her natural life cycle as a wife, mother and grandmother.
Sexual intercourse represents the essence of her commitment to her husband and her offspring. Women who have had many partners find it more difficult to bond to one man, and consequently he has difficulty bonding with her.
Take away a woman's innocence and she is a man, with a male sex-pattern, treating lovers as sex objects.
Then we have two male pretenders trying to bond. Like many homosexuals, who cannot form biological families, they remain alone, isolated and obsessed with sex.
Casual sex is another form of masturbation, only more risk, trouble and often not as good.
These days, we must strain to remember that sexual intercourse is the ritual of procreation, where an egg is fertilized (or not), and a new being capable of knowing God is created.
Free sex is promoted in order to destroy the heterosexual family. The bankers who financed Communism want the state to replace the father as head of the family.
If they have their way, the family of the future will have no husband or father. This is straight out of Aldous Huxley's Brave New World where babies are born in test tubes.
CONSEQUENCES
Feminism is responsible for turning woman into a sex object by undermining her identity as a wife and mother. Let me remind you of the hate feminist theorists feel toward heterosexuals and the biological family.
In the book, Feminist Politics and Human Nature, Allison Jagger, a philosophy professor at the Univ. of Colorado, writes that the nuclear family is "the corner stone of woman's oppression: it enforces women's dependence on men, it enforces heterosexuality and it imposes the prevailing masculine and feminine character structures on the next generation."
Feminist ideology aims to destroy heterosexual marriage, the cornerstone of social and individual stability. Our purpose, identity, values, support and companionship all depend on our family relationships.
Due to the decline of the family caused by feminism, male-female relations have been reduced to the level of sex and poisoned. Every man and woman has become a potential sexual object or predator. It doesn't matter if someone is married or underage. No one is off limits.
Men who do not become husbands and fathers and continue to see women as sex objects suffer from arrested development. Dozens of tits-and-ass magazines like Maxim perpetuate a juvenile attitude. There isn't one print magazine devoted to fatherhood.
Young women today put their energy into sex appeal. Men are attracted by sex, but they stay for a woman's other qualities.
Someone said, there is nothing sexier than intelligence.
CONCLUSION
We live in a society under the malignant grip of a satanic totalitarian philosophy, call it neo-Communism. Central bankers want to extend their monopoly on credit to control our bodies, minds and souls as well.
Psychological warfare techniques pioneered in wartime are being directed at us. Under the deception of "protecting" female or homosexual rights, heterosexuals are under relentless attack in schools and the media.
The giveaway is the campaign to treat homosexual and heterosexual marriage as if gays and straights were identical.
Equal does not mean identical unless the real goal is to turn heterosexuals into homosexuals, i.e. people who cannot establish a permanent bond with a member of the opposite sex. As someone said, equality = no quality.
The promotion of casual sex is designed to degrade and dehumanize us by attacking our natural heterosexual institutions and mores.
How long are we going to tolerate this vicious underhanded assault on our humanity by political and cultural leaders who have sold us out?
Every single thing I do,
Is seen by everybody in the world,
The greatest publicity machine,
What I eat and use,
The places I go,
Until it is impossible,
For me to do my own work in peace.
Everyone wants to influence,
But yet they fail to realise,
The day I stop my work,
Will be the day everyone is going to cry,
By trying to bankrupt me,
But I know it is not true,
Cause I have created,
Tremendous wealth by the things I do,
Everyone wants to see,
How I get out of debt,
But I have already proven them wrong,
Nobody can achieve,
The things I do,
But finding peace and solutions,
Which to me is more important than money,
To artificially hold me back,
Is to kill your own chance of making money,
The day I decide,
Not to touch the computer and TV,
To be a hermit and leave the world,
Nobody the wiser,
Everybody's the fool.
Carry on playing this game,
Till I am fedup and fustrated,
Then you will see the colors I exhibit.
I will do the most unimaginable,
By dumping everyone and everything.
The silence of the Lamb.
We are now living in the age of,
Where the enemy is not seen,
He can be in your own backyard,
There is no way of telling,
Even with the best intelligence units,
Who the enemy is,
The effects can be damaging,
Even when an event occurs,
It will be months before you can tell the truth,
So if you have a chain of command that decides,
A nuclear deterent with a person who will press the button,
The entire chain of command can be influenced,
To make the wrong decisions,
It is so alarming,
That it is better to disable,
Such an event from happening,
And work towards a peaceful solution,
Then to bring the world,
Towards a nuclear crisses.
No amount of technology, could solve the vulnerbility of exposed space satellites, even if a land based system is implemented, it has limited range. So a space based program would most likely be blind and if they solved the accuracy problem of homing into another missile, there will be ways to counter it. What do you get at last? A white elephant with dangerous junk out in space, and a sitting duck for others to hunt. Wasting money is one thing, grand dreams another, and being practical and stop this stupid nonsense that will accelerate the world into a nuclear war.
Monday 23rd May, 2005
World galloping towards nuclear war
Big News Network.com Thursday 19th May, 2005 (UPI)
Helen Caldicott is an Australian physician who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1985 and is the president of the Nuclear Policy Research Institute based in Washington. She spoke with UPI National Security Correspondent Martin Sieff.
Q. The New York Times reported Wednesday that the U.S. Air Force is seeking approval from President George W. Bush for new weapons to secure the United States from attack from space. As a prominent opponent to the militarization of space,
what is your response to that news?
A. Everything that was predicted at our conference this week on the weaponization of space in Airlie, Virginia, is already coming true. It seems as if the Bush administration and the Air Force are going to go ahead with everything that was said at our conference on the weaponization of space that was most alarming. This issue was under the radar of public opinion for a long time, but it is now coming into view.
Russia and China have both said for some years that if the United States puts weapons into space they will super-saturate any and all U.S. anti-ballistic missile systems and space-based weapons by building thousands more nuclear weapons each to counter any U.S. missile-defense system.
Q. The United States is the dominant space-faring nation with more military satellites in orbit than every other nation combined.
How difficult would it be to disrupt or destroy U.S. space-based systems?
A. Any nation. Military satellites are very vulnerable. As we learned at our conference the easiest way to paralyze the entire U.S. space satellite system in low Earth orbit is by detonating a nuclear weapon at that level above the Earth to produce radiation in the belt where the satellites orbit. The satellites built to function for 10 years will then all die a slow death over just a few weeks as they pass through the most irradiated areas.
And if you detonate a single nuclear weapon in the upper atmosphere you will produce an electric magnetic pulse, or EMP. One nuclear weapon detonated in near space would therefore melt down the entire electronic communications network of the United States.
This would of course ruin the U.S. economy and utterly disrupt society across the country. But it would have even more grave consequences. There are 103 nuclear power plants across the United States. They all rely on external electricity supply that powers their water-coolant systems. If these were all knocked out, you would run the risk of more than 100 Chernobyl-scale nuclear core meltdowns across the United States.
All the power plants have their own back-up generators, of course, but they would all need time crank up and too often their testing and maintenance has been neglected because they so seldom, if ever, have had to be used in the past, and some of them don't work when they're supposed to. Therefore there would indeed be a real risk of many Chernobyls all over the place. Thus a single EMP detonation in space aimed against U.S. military space-based assets could produce a truly cataclysmic outcome, and it would be very easy to do.
Q. Does the United States have any plans to put nuclear weapons or nuclear power systems into space?
A. There are also serious plans being discussed to make nuclear reactors that will function in space to eventually power U.S. space ships to other worlds in the Solar System. Already a new plutonium-producing nuclear facility is being set up in Idaho, and the plutonium nuclear fuel that is being produced there is not even the regular plyutonum-239 but the far more toxic plutonium-238.
There are discussions well under way to eventually make a nuclear spaceship called Prometheus that could get people out to planetary destinations like Mars far more quickly.
Q. The Cold War has been over for almost a decade and a half. How serious is the threat of mutually assured destruction between the United States and Russia today?
A. Russia still has 2,500 nuclear weapons and the United States has 5,000. There are only 240 major cities in the entire Northern Hemisphere. The Federal Emergency Management Agency has concluded that 40 nuclear weapons are targeted on New York City alone. There are probably 50 or 60 of them targeted on Washington, D.C. Every city and town in the United States is targeted with at least one H-bomb or thermonuclear weapon. And the Russians build really big H-bombs.
Q. But surely, the Russian radar tracking and space-based surveillance networks keep them informed that the United States is not contemplating any surprise attack upon them?
A. None of the Russian early-warning satellites work. Therefore the Russians are acutely worried that the United States doctrine of pre-emptive war is a real threat to them and it makes them very paranoid, because their satellites to provide them with better warning just do not work.
Most people do not realize that the Russian nuclear system is already on hair-trigger alert, and even worse, the Russian early-warning system is in a dangerous state of decay. (Veteran U.S. arms negotiator) Ambassador Thomas Graham has said that we are already in a white-knuckle situation over this. And Professor Steven Weinberg, who won the Nobel Prize for Physics, told our conference on Tuesday that the thing that scared him the most was that nobody else was scared, and they all ought to be.
Q. Have there been any near misses that ran the risk of triggering all-out nuclear war since the disintegration of the Soviet Union?
A. The United States and the world came far closer to total nuclear catastrophe in 1995 than anyone seems to remember or realize, even though it was documented and reported in The New York Times. Norway launched a missile near a U.S. Trident submarine deployment. The Kremlin had been notified in advance that the missile would be fired, but just forgot the warning. The Russian radar picked up the Norwegian launch and concluded that they were under attack from a U.S. strategic nuclear missile submarine.
For the first time in history, Russian President Boris Yeltsin opened the "football," the suitcase containing the Russian nuclear launch codes, and he had three minutes to decide whether to authorize an all-out Russian nuclear response. Only 10 seconds before the three minutes ran out, the Norwegian missile veered off course and this was reported to Yeltsin. There had even been a general at his elbow urging a full retaliatory strike. America was just 10 seconds from annihilation. This story was reported on the back page of the New York Times when it should have been on the front page.
Q. Was this a freak scenario that could never happen again?
A. This could certainly happen again. A retired senior Russian military officer said to me recently, "Helen, we're so worried we could blow you up by mistake." And there are other dire possibilities. The Russians have to deal with terrorists and extremists who could conceivably seize control of a missile-command center.
Q. What kind of priority should we therefore give reducing potential nuclear tensions between the United States and other nations, especially Russia?
A. This is the most urgent issue facing the human race. If America ever launched its 5,000 nuclear missiles and Russia its 2,500 nuclear missiles it would probably be enough to create a nuclear winter or "dark fall." So much dust, smoke, debris and burned carbon material would be thrown into the atmosphere that plants would be unable to carry out photosynthesis. Most species of life would slowly freeze to death in the dark.
Q. You paint a horrifying scenario. Why do we not see more discussion about this?
A. What alarms me most of all is that nobody is talking any more about all this. The new reports on Wednesday about the latest plans for space militarization will dangerously escalate tensions with Russia and China.
President Bush won re-election by running on what he called the moral issues like banning abortion and gay marriage. But the real moral issue for all people and all religions is whether creation itself will continue to survive, and the possibility that total catastrophe could happen is not low.
Q. Why are U.S., Russian and other leaders not grappling with this issue more seriously?
A. Each side refuses to share its secrets with the other. The thinking of everyone still appears to be in the pre-World War I mode. That was what Einstein warned against. He said the creation of nuclear weapons changed everything. Thus we drift towards the precipice. Indeed, I would say now we are galloping toward it.
NFS Watch. Netlog. Asax. Tripwire. SATAN. TIS Toolkit. GateD. Sniffing. Spoofing. CRON
Phlishing. Browser Hijack. Tracking. Malware. Cookies. Spider/Bot. Spamming.
Memory Leak. Brude Force. DDOS attack. CPU overheating. Remote shutdown.
Remote administration. Blue Screen attack. Key Logger. CGI Bin. Tunnelling.
Listening/monitoring. Reassembly of emails. Reassembly of TCPIP packets.
Protecting all your Ports letting only the desired packets thru.
Isolating all security for your server on Internet.
Checking for Malware.
Being Anonymous on the Internet.
Using Spider/Bot to acquire knowledge.
Assessing the PC via powerlines.
Overloading the Power Supply.
Encryption via powerlines.
Downloading Spyware( Hidden/Disguised).
Embedding codes into Pictures and Sound.
Tracking by Downloading files (pics & sound).
Using Server Monitoring S/w for Tracking users ( U will know where they are from).
Picking up information from the Browser.
DNS Tools - Finding all info about the server.
Server Logs - Identifying problems b4 they occur(maintainance).
Remote backup/recovery via Ghost.
All about XP Secrets (Everything).
All about protocols.
Using the Firewall to test unknown protocols.
Finding all hidden codes on a webpage and the tools utilised.
Accessing info from a mobile phone (java/bluetooth/infra enabled)
Scheduling and automation for Desktop/Server (An Insider's view)
The greatest danger,
Is the Naked Flame,
And coalminers must learn,
Never to use naked flame in underground tunnels,
The lack of proper breathing appliance,
Dangerous gases exists,
To ignore is at your peril,
Cause nothing can compensate,
The Human Lives,
Proper lighting equipment,
Government must assist to revamp,
Companies who do not follow,
A heavy fine to ensure,
Protecting the Human Lives,
The pressing needs of energy,
Will never be replaced,
By the value of a single soul.
The H5N1 virus belongs to the same family as the Ebola virus,
Therefore extreme measures must be adopted,
Mutation occur between bird and human,
Until it overcomes the human immunity system,
Then the Human will become a superinfector,
By then if he is not isolated,
He will spread it via air to a lot of people.
The solution lies,
In the creation of isolation rooms,
At point zero where the virus is identified,
And once that superinfector is found,
Isolate him immediately.
You only need to produce,
Enough vaccine for the areas of problem,
Not necessarily for the whole world,
The risks is now still low,
But if nothing is done,
We may have a big problem in less than six months,
Adopt SOP as similar as the Ebola,
You already have the experience,
But treat it as the most dangerous,
Because it is now airborne.
Diabetes can be caused and a few people are more prone to get it than others. I think it is an artificial agent that is linked to the chromosomes will cause the pancreas to stop producing insulin, and now recently available medication can reverse this effect. Diet can also caused the conset of diabetes but different age groups are unlikely able to get it at the same time, unless of course they live in the same household. I think the anwers lie in the genome of the body where DNA tests can identify the event that triggers the onset of diabetes, by comparing a diabetes patient and a non diabetes patient. An external event can trigger diabetes, which can occur naturally and is linked to a person's age and lifestyle. The discovery of Type 3 diabetes. Symptons : Extreme drinking of water. Blurred vision. Multiple trips to toilet. Urinary Tract Infection. Kidney diesase. Tooth Decay. Weakness - no strength. Insomia.
PARIS, May 11 - Researchers believe they have made an important breakthrough in understanding the severest form of diabetes, confirming that the disease begins when the body's immune system reacts to the hormone insulin. Their work, published on Thursday in the British science journal Nature, may bring the curtain down on a frustrating hunt for the initial trigger for Type 1 diabetes and throws open new paths in the search for a treatment. Diabetes occurs when lack of insulin causes wild fluctuations of glucose in the blood, leading to cardiovascular problems, even loss of limbs, kidney failure, blindness and death.
Type 1 diabetes is the severer, inherited but thankfully rarer form of the disease -- it is an auto-immune disorder, in which the body attacks itself, with catastrophic consequences. It usually occurs in childhood, when immune cells called lymphocytes start to attack beta islet cells that make insulin in the pancreas.
A vicious circle then starts up. The remnants of the beta cells are transported to a draining lymph node in the pancreas, where they attract the attention of immune-system scouts, which in turn prime more lymphocytes to destroy more beta cells. After 80-90 percent of the beta cells have been wiped out, the first clinical symptoms of diabetes show up. Patients have to take insulin shots the rest of their life, and be rigorous about their dietary habits, to help keep their blood sugar levels stable. But what causes the destructive cascade in the first place? What is the trigger -- the antigen -- that causes the immune system to go haywire like this? To find out, University of Colorado scientist George Eisenbarth and colleagues took a strain of mice that usually develop Type 1 diabetes. Some of the rodents were then genetically engineered so that they lacked normal insulin. To ensure that these mice did not die, the team modified the rodents' genes so that they provided a form of insulin that was hormonally active but which would not be recognised by lymphocytes. Mice with the normal insulin fell sick with diabetes -- but mice with the modified insulin remained healthy. In another paper that also points to insulin as the culprit antigen, Harvard Medical School's David Hafler and colleagues isolated immune cells from the pandreatic draining node of patients with Type 1 diabetes. In a lab dish, they identified the proteins to which these immune cells responded. Half of these cells responded when they were exposed to just a fragment of the insulin molecule. But there was no such response among immune cells taken from healthy patients without diabetes. The pioneering work clearly points the finger at insulin as the trigger which unleashes autoimmune lymphocytes, said immune system specialist Matthias von Herrath in a commentary.
The discovery throws up exciting avenues for potential treatment, perhaps by wiping out the aggressive cells or preventing them from going on the offensive in the first place, he said. But the crucial first step will be to identify exactly which proteins and peptides on the insulin molecule are recognised by the aggressive lymphocytes, and what precisely happens to the cells once they are primed this way. Type 1 diabetes affects about one every 400-500 children and adolescents in the United States. Although the disease has a genetic cause, it can be amplified by nutrition and infection. The other sort of diabetes, Type 2, is linked to obesity and other lifestyle causes, and has reached epidemic proportions in the United States. It accounts for about 90 percent of all cases of diabetes and usually shows up in adults aged 40 or above. In this case, insulin is produced but at insufficient levels or does not work efficiently, either because it is defective in some way or the cells themselves have become resistant to it.
- AFP
Mankind has not discovered,
The relationship between Spread Spectrum,
And its effects on the Human Sensory perceptions,
It creates a noise like environment,
Which the Human perceives,
As noises of the Mind,
And prolong exposure,
Can drive a person insane,
This environment can occur naturally,
Or be artifically induced.
And it cannot be jammed,
Making it ideal,
For Mind Control,
Cause the whispering thoughts,
Will brainwash you,
You cannot identify,
What is real or not.
It is therefore better to delay the deployment of,
And spent more time in research,
Cause now it only affects a small group of people,
You will never know if a large group can be affected,
An ideal weapon of war.
Control this technology,
Or mankind may be unaware killing,
Their very own existence.
Expert Systems - Principles and Programming
Joseph C. Giarratano - Gary D. Ridley
Table of Contents
1. Introduction to Expert Systems
2. The Representation of Knowledge
3. Methods of Inference
4. Reasoning Under Uncertainty
5. Inexact Reasoning
6. Design of Expert Systems
7. Introduction to CLIPS
8. Advanced Pattern Matching
9. Modular Design, Execution Control, and Rule Efficiency
10. Procedural Programming
11. Classes, Instances, and Message-Handlers
12. Expert System Design Examples
Appendices
A: Some Useful Equivalences
B: Some Elementary Quantifiers and Their Meanings
C: Some Set Properties
D: CLIPS Support Information
E: CLIPS Commands and Functions Summary
F: CLIPS BNF
G: Software Resources
|
Search This Site
Syndicate this blog site
Powered by BlogEasy
Free Blog Hosting
|